Infinispan
Friday, 25 November 2011

Infinispan @Devoxx

›
Compared with the previous editions, this year's Devoxx was not that different: well organised, packed with interesting presentations an...
Wednesday, 23 November 2011

More on transaction performance: use1PcForAutoCommitTransactions

›
What's use1PcForAutoCommitTransactions all about? Don't be scared the name, use1PcForAutoCommitTransactions is a new feature (5.1....
Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Infinispan 5.1.0.BETA5 is out!

›
Infinispan 5.1.0.BETA5 has just been the released with a few interesting additions and important fixes: Locks acquired within a transactio...
1 comment:
Friday, 11 November 2011

Some worth mentioning improvements for pessimistic transactions

›
Pessimistic transactions were added in 5.1 and are the "rebranding" of eager transactions from previous Infinispan releases. But b...
Thursday, 10 November 2011

Fewer deadlocks, higher throughput

›
Here's the problem: first transaction ( T1 ) writes to key a and b in this order. Second transaction ( T2 ) writes to key b and a - ...
Wednesday, 9 November 2011

Single lock owner: an important step forward

›
The single lock owner is a highly requested Infinispan improvement. The basic idea behind it is that, when writing to a key, locks are no lo...

More locking improvements in Infinispan 5.1.0.BETA4

›
The latest beta in the Infinispan 5.1 "Brahma" series is out. So, what's in Infinispan 5.1.0.BETA4? Here are the highlights: ...
‹
›
Home
View web version

Contributors

  • Andrea
  • Dan
  • Don Naro
  • Galder Zamarreño
  • Ion Savin
  • Katia Aresti
  • Manik Surtani
  • Martin Genčúr
  • Mircea Markus
  • Paul Ferraro
  • Pedro Ruivo
  • Pete Muir
  • Pete
  • Ryan Emerson
  • Sanne
  • Sebastian Łaskawiec
  • Tomáš Sýkora
  • Tristan Tarrant
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
  • Vladimir Blagojevic
  • rigazilla
Powered by Blogger.